Another Judge’s Impartiality Questioned, You’ll Never Guess Who

Former President Donald Trump’s legal team has filed a motion seeking the recusal of New York State Supreme Court Justice Juan Merchan from the ongoing criminal case involving alleged hush-money payments to Stormy Daniels.

The motion raises concerns about Judge Merchan’s potential conflict of interest due to his daughter’s employment at Authentic Campaigns, a company involved in Democratic campaigns, including President Biden’s election campaign.


  1. Conflict of interest: Trump’s lawyers argue that Judge Merchan’s daughter’s employment at Authentic Campaigns could create a conflict of interest, as rulings in the case may financially benefit her.
  2. Alleged bias: The motion claims that Judge Merchan has exhibited bias against President Trump, citing his prior involvement in a case encouraging cooperation against Trump.
  3. Political contributions: Trump’s legal team highlights small-dollar donations made by Judge Merchan to left-leaning causes, suggesting a potential political bias that may affect his neutrality in the case.
  4. Request for federal court: The motion seeks to move the case to federal court, where Trump’s attorneys believe a more impartial venue can be provided.
  5. Upholding justice: Trump’s legal team emphasizes the importance of a fair and unbiased judicial process, regardless of political affiliations, to ensure a just outcome.

The motion filed by Trump’s attorneys raises legitimate concerns about the fairness and impartiality of the ongoing case. It is crucial that potential conflicts of interest and alleged bias are thoroughly examined to ensure justice is served.

Moving the case to federal court could provide a more neutral venue for the proceedings. Upholding the principles of justice is essential, and all parties should work towards ensuring a fair trial that respects the rights of the accused.

Source Fox News